期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Pediatrics Research. 2022; 2: (4) ; 29-31 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijped.20220047.

Clinical effect analysis of different regimens on acute respiratory tract infection in children
不同方案对儿童急性呼吸道感染的临床疗效分析

作者: 刘洁 *

深圳市龙岗区第三人民医院 广东深圳

*通讯作者: 刘洁,单位:深圳市龙岗区第三人民医院 广东深圳;

发布时间: 2022-12-28 总浏览量: 265

摘要

目的 分析不同方案对儿童急性呼吸道感染的具体临床疗效。方法 对2021年8月-2022年8月本科接诊儿童急性呼吸道感染患儿(n=80)进行随机分组,试验和对照组各40人,前者采取全程抗菌药物治疗,后者行常规治疗。对比较两组患儿病症表现情况以及病程长短、治疗费用等指标。结果 关于病症表现,试验组数据和对照组相比更轻、复诊率更低;关于病程长短,试验组的咳嗽、咽痛、发热持续时间和对照组相比更短;关于治疗费用,试验组数据和对照组相比更少(P<0.05)。结论 抗菌药物的使用能够在一定程度上缓解儿童急性上呼吸道感染的病症轻重程度,儿童出现不良反应以及复诊的概率也大幅降低,对临床症状的改善极为有利。

关键词: 急性呼吸道感染;儿童;临床方案;疗效差异

Abstract

Objective To analyze the specific clinical efficacy of different regimens on acute respiratory tract infection in children.
Methods From August 2021 to August 2022, 80 children (n=80) with acute respiratory tract infection were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 40 children in each group. The former was treated with full antimicrobial therapy, while the latter was treated with conventional therapy. The symptoms, duration of disease and treatment cost were compared between the two groups.
Results Compared with the control group, the data of the experimental group were lighter and the return visit rate was lower. As for the duration of disease, the duration of cough, sore throat and fever in the experimental group was shorter than that in the control group. Compared with the control group, the data of the experimental group were less (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   The use of antibiotics can alleviate the severity of acute upper respiratory tract infection in children to a certain extent, and the probability of adverse reactions and return visit in children is also greatly reduced, which is very beneficial to the improvement of clinical symptoms.

Key words: Acute respiratory tract infection; Children; Clinical protocol; Curative effects

参考文献 References

[1] 梁瑞添,王依.小儿急性上呼吸道感染患儿81例的临床治疗效果观察[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(10):132-134.

[2] 张霞.雾化吸入治疗小儿上呼吸道感染后咳嗽的效果[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2020,30(9):150~151.

[3] 王天玥,冯晶,程琪,等.小儿咽扁颗粒联合头孢克洛治疗疑似细菌性急性上呼吸道感染的临床观察[J].国际儿科学杂志,2021,48(10):720-722.

[4] 熊亮.复方芩兰口服液联合头孢呋辛治疗小儿急性上呼吸道感染患儿的疗效及对炎症介质水平的影响[J].中国药物经济学,2021,16(10):75-78.

[5] 任波,李瑞丽,袁晓锋.两种药物治疗小儿急性呼吸道感染对患儿血清CRPPA和IL-6水平的影响比较[J].河北医学,2021,27(02):339-343.

[6] 郑晓琴.孟鲁司特与布地奈德和复方异丙托溴胺雾化吸入联用对小儿呼吸道感染后咳嗽的疗效评价[J].中国现代医生,2020,58(25):107-109.

[7] 郑慧漪.小儿急性呼吸道感染应用头孢类药物联合阿奇霉素治疗的疗效及安全性研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2019,27(S1):113-115.

[8] 李英会,张瑾,杨环玮,朱立春,刘呈祥.加味取渊汤治疗小儿上呼吸道感染风热夹痰证的临床疗效及对血清肿瘤坏死因子-α与白细胞介素-6水平的a影响[J].长春中医药大学学报,2020,36(06):1197-1200.

引用本文

刘洁, 不同方案对儿童急性呼吸道感染的临床疗效分析[J]. 国际儿科研究杂志, 2022; 2: (4) : 29-31.